FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Delaying second doses of COVID-19 vaccines should reduce case numbers in the near term; however, the longer term case burden and the potential for evolution of viral 鈥榚scape鈥� from immunity will depend on the robustness of immune responses generated by natural infections and one or two vaccine doses, according to a study from 不良研究所 and Princeton University published today in Science.
鈥淪everal countries, including the United Kingdom and Canada have stated that they will delay second doses of COVID-19 vaccines in response to supply shortages, but also in an attempt to rapidly increase the number of people immunized,鈥� explains , a graduate student in the Departments of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (EEB) and Quantitative and Computational Biology in the Lewis-Sigler Institute at Princeton and the lead author of the study.
鈥淭he original clinical trials of the vaccines, plus subsequent epidemiology, are quite optimistic regarding the efficacy of the first dose. However, we are still uncertain how the strength and duration of immunity from a single dose (or the full two-dose course or natural infection, for that matter) will persist in the longer term鈥�, adds Saad-Roy.
The researchers used a simple model to project forward the incidence of COVID-19 cases, as well as the degree of immunity of the population, under a range of vaccine dosing regimes and assumptions related to immune responses. 鈥淕iven the immunological and epidemiological uncertainties driving these outcomes, simple models are an essential tool to explore future possibilities鈥� says Caroline Wagner, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at 不良研究所, and the senior author on this paper.
One dose may not always be enough
The study found that one-dose strategies may, as expected, reduce case numbers in the short term by more rapidly immunizing a greater number of individuals. However, if immune responses after one dose are less robust, subsequent epidemic peaks may be larger.
鈥淢ore optimistically, we find that as vaccine capacity increases, increasing vaccination rates or changing the dosing regime to closer to the recommended two-dose schedule can mitigate these longer term epidemiological effects, which is important for public health planning,鈥� adds Wagner.
Another important outcome associated with imperfect immune responses is the potential for viral immune escape. To start addressing this complex issue, the authors adapted a previous , developed by co-authors , , and , along with other colleagues not involved with the current work. This theory predicts that in individuals with partial immunity, moderate selection pressure combined with sufficient viral transmission could drive evolution. Here, the authors explore this possibility along with a range of other scenarios, including the more optimistic case of minimal potential for adaptation in hosts with waned immunity following one or two vaccine doses.
鈥淎t least one variant has already emerged that may be adapted for partial immune escape,鈥� notes Holmes. 鈥淪imple theory underlines that the evolution and transmission of variants by infected hosts with intermediate levels of immunity may be important. Therefore, the strength and duration of immunity, and particularly the effect of these on retransmission, are key parameters to determine鈥� adds Grenfell.
One intuitive finding that the paper emphasizes is that very low rates of vaccine administration may be associated with larger case numbers and, possibly, more elevated potential for viral adaptation. 鈥淭his strongly underlines the importance of equitable global vaccine distribution, as immune escape in one location will rapidly spread,鈥� explains C. Jessica E. Metcalf, a co-author on the paper, and an Associate Professor in EEB and the School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton and an associated faculty member at the High Meadows Environmental Institute.
鈥淭he models are relatively simple conceptually, but they illustrate the complexities of the problem and highlight the challenges that we still face,鈥� notes Michael Boots, a Professor of Integrative Biology at UC Berkeley who was not affiliated with the present study. 鈥淭his important piece of work provides a framework that we can use to inform our approach going forward and moreover identifies the key knowledge gaps that we need to address,鈥� adds Boots.
About this study
The article 鈥溾�� by Chadi Saad-Roy, Caroline Wagner and al. was published in Science.
Media Contact:
Fr茅d茅rique Mazerolle
Email: frederique.mazerolle [at] mcgill.ca
Phone: (514) 398-6693
Mobile: (514) 617-8615
This article was originally published in 不良研究所 Newsroom