Human Rights and the Contraceptive Imperative - March 2016
9 March 2016, 13h-14h30, IHSP, Charles Meredith House
10 March 2016, 12h30-14h, NCDH 316, Faculty of Law
Professor Joanna Erdman, MacBain Chair in聽Health Law and Policy, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie聽University
(Co-sponsored with the IHSP and the )
Abstract
This paper examines the upsurge in global advocacy on and for human rights in family聽planning, and claims that like so many other fields in human rights, family planning has become depoliticized. Its language of choice and access occludes primary causes of violations, the聽precarious conditions of the labor market, the sexual division of care work, and the gender dimensions of economic restructuring which structure peoples鈥� lives and often leave聽pregnancy as the only source of social and economic security. The human rights agenda turns rather to more manageable projects in health service delivery, protecting the individual from harm versus offering a program of social justice. Human rights in family planning are defined by the guarantee of choice and access within socio-economic constraints, each individual empowered as a responsible agent and accountable for their own well-being. This is the same belief that sustains economic relations of social inequality, including the disparagement and disillusionment of the state and of public health systems as social institutions. Human rights in family planning have become estranged from political empowerment and collective action, delinking reproduction from economic resources, secure livelihoods and participation in public life.
Speaker
Joanna Erdman is an assistant professor and the inaugural MacBain Chair in聽Health Law and Policy at the Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie聽University. Her research focuses on sexual and聽reproductive health law in a transnational context. She has published in leading journals on harm reduction in safe abortion, the regulation of聽emergency contraception, and human papillomavirus vaccines聽policy, and she is the co-editor of the recent collection, Abortion Law in Transnational Perspective: Cases and聽Controversies (UPenn Press, 2014).
Joanna chairs the Global Health Advisory Committee of the Public Health Program, Open Society Foundations and the Gender and Rights Panel of the Human Reproduction Programme, World Health Organization.
Joanna received her BA and JD degrees from聽the University of Toronto and her聽LLM from Harvard, and completed a fellowship at Yale Law School.
Challenging state health policies in Europe under the right to private and family life
20 January 2016, 12:30-14:00, NCDH 316
The 不良研究所 Research Group on Health and Law (RGHL) was delighted to have Dr. Ivana Isailovic present聽its second seminar of the 2015-2016 academic year on "Challenging state health policies in Europe under the right to private and family life".鈥�
The presentation discussed how European state health measures have been challenged before the European Court of Human Rights under the right to private and family life, which is enshrined in article 8 of the European Human Rights Convention. It also analyzed how the Court鈥檚 decisions have evolved, drawing on recent cases related to women鈥檚 access to abortion and transgender individuals鈥� demands for legal gender change. It highlighted some of the consequences of this interpretation of the Convention, which may have unintended effects on these individuals鈥� human rights.
Ivana Isailovic聽est Boursi猫re Boulton 脿 l'Universit茅 不良研究所. Elle a travaill茅 脿 la Equality Law Clinic, laquelle est rattach茅e au Centre Perelman de philosophie du droit et 脿 l鈥橧nstitut d鈥櫭塼udes Europ茅ennes (IEE) de l鈥橴niversit茅 libre de Bruxelles. Ses int茅r锚ts de recherche se portent sur les activistes en mati猫re de droit 脿 l'avortement et les communaut茅s transgenres. Elle a un PhD en droit des Sciences Po et un Master鈥檚 en droit international de l'Universit茅 Paris 1 Sorbonne.
Managing Risks Related to Modern Biotechnologies and their Foods
30 November 2015, 13:00-14:30, NCDH 316
The Research Group on Health and Law, in collaboration with the 不良研究所 School of Environment, was delighted to welcome Professor Ludivine Petetin.
The development of modern biotechnologies (including genetic modification of plants and animals, and animal cloning) and their resulting foods has been controversial. They allegedly are underpinned by scientific uncertainty. To regulate such technologies and to ensure information and safety, the European Union has adopted a precautionary approach. More specifically, the EU regulatory frameworks rely on premarket authorization and mandatory labelling. An analysis of the policy and regulatory provisions addressing modern biotechnologies and their derived products in the EU shows that gaps in the law and asymmetric relationships between competing European and national policies pose great risks to the EU food system and the environment.
Dr. Ludivine Petetin is an Assistant Professor at the School of Law of the University of Hull in the United Kingdom. Her research focuses on the policy, law and regulation of food, agriculture and environmental protection. In particular, she is interested in food security, agri-technology, sustainable agriculture, and investigates public participation and governance issues. She is a co-founder of the recently established @FEED (Agriculture, Technology, Food, Environment, Energy and Democracy) Research Centre at the University of Hull. She has been a Visiting Scholar at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a Visiting Lecturer at the Sant鈥橝nna School of Advanced Studies (Italy). Dr. Petetin holds postgraduate degrees from Paris II Panth茅on-Assas in France, the University of Glasgow and the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. From September 2015, she serves as the British Deputy National Delegate of the European Council for Agricultural Law (CEDR).
